Legal & compliance · Coverage

Where AskElira operates

Your agreement carries the student-privacy law of the place your school is in. That is why onboarding asks where you are before it asks anything else — and why the list below is short.

A place is on the first list only when two things are true. A person has read the whole onboarding packet against that place’s law and signed off on it, and every deadline that law imposes is one this software already meets. The second test is mechanical and it runs on every deployment: if a state required us to notify you of a breach faster than our systems do, or to delete family data sooner than they do, that state comes off this list automatically until the software changes — not the paperwork.

Onboarding today

PlaceSchools we can onboardLaw your agreement carries
New York City
New York
Charter school, District public school
NY Education Law § 2-d (N.Y. Educ. Law § 2-d)
Binds third-party contractors that receive student data from an educational agency: a signed addendum, a data security and privacy plan, the Parents’ Bill of Rights supplement, and breach notice to the agency without unreasonable delay.
8 NYCRR Part 121 (8 NYCRR §§ 121.1–121.12)
The implementing regulation: § 121.3(c) supplement content, § 121.6 plan contents, § 121.9 contractor obligations, and the § 121.10 breach-notice clock of no more than seven calendar days after discovery.
FERPA (20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99)
AskElira acts as a school official with a legitimate educational interest, under the school’s direct control, using data only for the contracted purpose.
TCPA (47 U.S.C. § 227; 47 CFR § 64.1200)
Governs automated calls and texts to guardians: prior express consent, the called party’s local-time curfew, sender identity, a callback number, and an honoured opt-out.
NYCPS Chancellor’s Regulation A-820 (Chancellor’s Regulation A-820)
Governs confidentiality and release of student records in New York City Public Schools; a district-authorized school applies it on top of § 2-d.
New York State
New York
Charter school, District public school
NY Education Law § 2-d (N.Y. Educ. Law § 2-d)
Binds third-party contractors that receive student data from an educational agency: a signed addendum, a data security and privacy plan, the Parents’ Bill of Rights supplement, and breach notice to the agency without unreasonable delay.
8 NYCRR Part 121 (8 NYCRR §§ 121.1–121.12)
The implementing regulation: § 121.3(c) supplement content, § 121.6 plan contents, § 121.9 contractor obligations, and the § 121.10 breach-notice clock of no more than seven calendar days after discovery.
FERPA (20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99)
AskElira acts as a school official with a legitimate educational interest, under the school’s direct control, using data only for the contracted purpose.
TCPA (47 U.S.C. § 227; 47 CFR § 64.1200)
Governs automated calls and texts to guardians: prior express consent, the called party’s local-time curfew, sender identity, a callback number, and an honoured opt-out.

Not yet — and what is missing

These are places we have researched and cannot serve today. The reason is stated as it is, not as a date we have not earned. If your school is on this list and you want us there, tell us — a school waiting is the thing that moves one of these up.

PlaceLaw we would have to paperWhy we are not there
California
Charter school, District public school
California Ed. Code § 49073.1 (Cal. Educ. Code § 49073.1)
SOPIPA (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22584)
Preliminary research, not a reviewed legal position.
No California statutory addendum has been drafted. Education Code § 49073.1 prescribes contract terms a school district agreement must contain; until those terms exist as an executable document and a person has read them against the base packet, a California school cannot be onboarded.
Florida
Charter school, District public school
Florida student records (Fla. Stat. § 1002.22; § 1002.222)
Preliminary research, not a reviewed legal position.
No Florida addendum drafted or reviewed.
Illinois
Charter school, District public school
Illinois SOPPA (105 ILCS 85)
Preliminary research, not a reviewed legal position.
No Illinois SOPPA addendum drafted or reviewed.
Los Angeles Unified School District
Charter school, District public school
California Ed. Code § 49073.1 (Cal. Educ. Code § 49073.1)
SOPIPA (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22584)
Preliminary research, not a reviewed legal position.
Inherits California’s block, and LAUSD’s own vendor data-security requirements have not been read.
Massachusetts
Charter school, District public school
Preliminary research, not a reviewed legal position.
No Massachusetts addendum drafted or reviewed; 201 CMR 17.00 requires a written information security program clause we have not papered.
New Jersey
Charter school, District public school
New Jersey student data privacy (N.J.S.A. 18A:36-35; N.J.A.C. 6A:32-7)
Preliminary research, not a reviewed legal position.
No New Jersey addendum drafted or reviewed.
New York — private & independent schools
Private / independent school
NY SHIELD Act (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law §§ 899-aa, 899-bb)
TCPA (47 U.S.C. § 227; 47 CFR § 64.1200)
Preliminary research, not a reviewed legal position.
A private school is not an "educational agency" under Education Law § 2-d, so the § 2-d Addendum that Part 3 of the packet is built around does not apply to it. Part 3 needs a different instrument — SHIELD Act data-security terms and a FERPA position that does not assume federal funding — and that instrument has not been written or reviewed.
Texas
Charter school, District public school
Texas Student Privacy Act (Tex. Educ. Code §§ 32.151–32.156)
Preliminary research, not a reviewed legal position.
No Texas addendum drafted; Education Code Chapter 32 Subchapter D has not been read against the packet.

The deadlines every school gets, everywhere

These are read from the running software, not typed onto this page. They are what a new state’s law is measured against before that state can appear above.

How this page stays true

Every law named on this page is watched. Once a week an automated job re-reads the 21 statutes, regulations and district policies these agreements rest on, and files a finding when one changes — with the changed sentence quoted and the clause it bears on named.

That job cannot change your agreement. It does not edit the packet, the contract text, or the software; it can only tell a person to look. A contract is a promise some running code has to keep, and no automated check can tell that a sentence has quietly become untrue — so a human reads every change and makes any edit, and the version history in your packet records what moved and when.